2.
A man is justified, in defending his person, that of his wife,
children, and servants, and for this purpose he may use as much force as
may be necessary, even to killing the assailant, remembering that the
means used must always be proportioned to the occasion, and an excess
becomes, itself, an injury.
3.
A man may also repel force by force in defence of his personal
property, and even justify homicide against one Who manifestly intends
or endeavors by violence or surprise to commit a known felony, as
robbery.
4.
With respect to the defence or protection of the possession of real
property, although it is justifiable even to kill a person in the act of
attempting to commit a forcible felony, as burglary or arson, yet this
justification can only take place when the party in possession is wholly
without fault. 1 Hale, 440, 444; 1 East, P. C. 259, 277. When a
forcible attack is made upon the dwelling-house of another, without any
felonious intent, but barely to commit a trespass, it is in general
lawful to oppose force by force, when the former was clearly illegal. 7
Bing. 305; S. C. 20 Eng. C. L. Rep. 139. Vide, generally, Ham. N. P. 136, 151 1 Chit. Pr. 589, 616; Grot. lib. 2, c. 1 Rutherf. Inst. B. 1, c. 16.
DEFENCE,
pleading, practice. It is defined to be the denial of the truth or
validity of the complaint, and does not signify a justification. It is a
general assertion that the plaintiff has no ground of action, which
assertion is afterwards extended and maintained in the plea. 3 Bl. Com.
296; Co. Litt. 127. It is similar to the contestatio litis of the civilians.
2.
Defence is of two descriptions; first half defence, which is as
follows, "venit et defendit vim et injuriam, et dicit," &c.; or
secondly, full defence, "venit et defendit vim et injuriam, quando,"
&c. meaning "quando et ubi curia consideravit," (or when and where
it shall behoove him,) " et damna et quicquid quod ipse defendere debet
et dicit," &c. Co. Litt. 127, b; Bac. Abr. Pleas, D Willis, 41.
3.
In strictness, the words quando, &c. ought not to be added when
only half defence is to be made; and after the words "venit et defendit
vim et injuriam," the subject matter of the plea should immediately be
stated. Gilb. C. P. 188; 8 T. R. 6 3 2; 3 B. & P. 9, n. a.
4.
It has, however, now become the practice in all cases, whether half or
full defence be intended, to, state it a's follows: "And the said C D,
by M N, his attorney, comes and defends the wrong, (or in trespass,
force) and injury, when, &c. and says," which will be considered
only as half defence in cases where such defence should be made, and as
full defence where the latter is necessary. 8 T. R. 633; Willis, 41 3 B.
& P. 9; 2 Saund. 209, c.
5.
If full defence were made expressly by the words "when and where it
shall behoove him," and "the damages and whatever else he ought to
defend," the defendant would be precluded from pleading to the
jurisdiction or in abatement, for by defending when and where it shall
behoove him, the defendant acknowledges the jurisdiction of the court
and by defending the damages he waives all. exception to the person of
the plaintiff. 2 Saund. 209, c.; 3 Bl. Com. 297 Co. Litt. 127, b Bac. Abr. Pleas, D.
6.
Want of defence being only matter of form, the omission is aided by
general demurrer. 3 Salk. 271. See further, 7 Vin. Abr. 497; 1 Chit. Pl.
410; Com. Dig. Abatement, I 16; Gould. on Pl. c. 2, s. 6-15; Steph. Pl.
430.
7.
In another sense, defence signifies a justification; as, the defendant
has made a successful defence to the charge laid in the indictment.
8.
The Act of Congress of April 30, 1790, 1 Story, L. U. S. 89, acting
upon the principles adopted in perhaps all the states, enacts, §28, that
every person accused and indicted of the crime of treason, or other
capital offence, shall "be allowed and admitted to make his full defence
by counsel learned in the law; and the court before whom such person
shall be tried, or some judge thereof, shall, and they are hereby
authorized and requited, immediately upon his request, to assign to such
person such counsel, not exceeding two, as such person shall desire, to
whom such counsel shall have free access, at all seasonable hours; and
every such person or persons, accused or indicted of the crimes
aforesaid, shall be allowed and admitted in his said defence, to make
any proof that he or they can produce, by lawful witness or witnesses,
and shall have the like process of the court where he or they shall be
tried, to compel his or their witnesses to appear at his or their trial,
as is usually granted to compel witnesses to appear on the prosecution
against them."
9.
Defences in equity may be classed in two divisions, namely into dilator
defences, (q. v.) and into those which are peremptory. Matters of
peremptory or permanent defences may be also divided into two sorts,
first, those where the plaintiff never had any right to institute the
suit; for example: 1. That the plaintiff had not a superior right to the
defendant. 2. That the defendant has no interest. 3. That there is no
privity between the plaintiff and defendant, or any right to sustain the
suit. Secondly, those that insist that the original right, if any, is
extinguished or determined; as, 1. When the right is determined by the
act of the parties; or, 2. When it is determined by operation of law. 4
Bouv. Inst. n. 4199, et seq.; 1 Montag. Eq. Pl. 89. See Dilatory
Defence; Merits.
TO DEFEND.
To forbid. This word is used in some old English statutes in the sense
it has in French, namely, to forbid. 5 Pic. 2, c. Lord Coke uses the
word in this sense: it is defended by law to distrain on the highway."
Co Litt. 160, b. 161 a. In an old work entitled , Legends, printed by
Winkin de Worde, in 1527, fo. 96, we find examples of the use of the
word in this sense, " He defended," (forbade) " to pay the wage,"
(tribute,) " for he said he was a king." " She wrote the obligation when
she put her hand to the tree against the defence." (prohibition of
God.)
2.
In pleading, to defend is to deny; and the effect of the word "defends"
is, that the defendant denies the right of the plaintiff, or the force
and wrong charged. Steph. Pl. 432.
3.
In contracts, to defend is to guaranty; to agree to indemnify. In most
conveyances of land the grantor covenants to warrant and defend. It is
his duty, then, to prevent all persons against whom he defends, from
doing any act which would evict him; when there is a mortgage upon the
land, and the mortgagee demands possession or payment of the covenantee,
and threatens suit, this is a breach of the covenant to defend, and for
quiet enjoyment. 17 Mass. R. 586.
DEFENDANT.
A party who is sued in a personal action. Vide Demandant; Par- ties to
Actions; Pursuer; and Com. Dig. Abatement, F; Action upon the case upon
assumpsit, E, b; Bouv. Inst. Index, h. t.
2.
At common law a defendant cannot have judgment to recoyer a sum of
money of the plaintiff. But this rule is, in some cases, altered by the
act of assembly in Pennsylvania,
as by the. Act of 1705, for defalcation, by which he may sue out a sci.
fac. on the record of a verdict for a sum found in his favor. 6 Binn.
Rep. 175. See Account 6.
DEFENDANT IN ERROR. A party against whom a writ of error is sued out.
DEFENDER, canon law. The name by which the defendant or respondent is known in the ecclesiastical courts.
DEFENSIVE ALLEGATION. The defence or mode of propounding a defence in the spiritual courts, is so called.
No comments:
Write comments