ACCESS,
persons. Approach, or the means or power of approaching. Sometimes by
access is understood sexual intercourse; at other times the opportunity
of communicating together so that sexual intercourse may have taken
place, is also called access. 1 Turn. & R. 141.
2.
In this sense a man who can readily be in company with his wife, is
said to have access to her; and in that case, her issue are presumed to
be his issue. But this presumption may be rebutted by positive evidence
that no sexual intercourse took place. lb.
3.
Parents are not allowed to prove non-access, for the purpose of
bastardizing the issue of the wife; nor will their declarations be
received after their deaths, to prove the want of access, with a like
intent. 1 P. A. Bro. R. App. xlviii.; Rep. tem. Hard. 79; Bull. N. P.
113; Cowp. R. 592; 8 East, R. 203; 11 East, R. 133. 2 Munf. R. 242; 3
Munf. R. 599; 7 N. S. 553; 4 Hayw R. 221, 3 Hawks, R 623 1 Ashm. R. 269;
6 Binn. R. 283; 3 Paige's R. 129; 7 N. S. 548. See Shelf. on Mar. &
Div. 711; and Paternity.
ACCESSARY,
criminal law. He who is not the chief actor in the perpetration of the
offence, nor present at its performance, but is some way concerned
therein, either before or after the fact committed.
2.
An accessary before the fact, is one who being absent at the time of,
the crime committed, yet procures, counsels, or commands another to
commit it. 1 Hale, P. C. 615. It is, proper to observe that when the act
is committed through the agency of a person who has no legal discretion
nor a will, as in the case of a child or an insane person, the incitor,
though absent when the crime was committed, will be considered, not an
accessary, for none can be accessary to the acts of a madman, but a
principal in the first degree. Fost. 340; 1 P. C. 118.
3.
An accessary after the fact, is one who knowing a felony to have been
committed, receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the felon. 4 Bl.
Com. 37.
4. No one who is a principal (q. v.) can be an accessary.
5.
In certain crimes, there can be no accessaries; all who are concerned
are principals, whether they were present or absent at the time of their
commission. These are treason, and all offences below the degree of
felony. 1 Russ. 21, et seq.; 4 Bl. Com. 35 to 40; 1 Hale, P. C. 615; 1
Vin. Abr. 113; Hawk. P. C. b. 2, c. 29, s. 16; such is the English Law.
But whether it is law in the United States appears not to be determined
as regards the cases of persons assisting traitors. Serg. Const. Law,
382; 4 Cranch, R. 472, 501; United States v. Fries, Parnphl. 199.
6.
It is evident there can be no accessary when there is no principal; if a
principal in a transaction be not liable under our laws, no one can be
charged as a more accessary to him. 1 W.& M. 221.
7.
By the rules of the common law, accessaries cannot be tried without
their consent, before the principals. Foster, 360. The evils resulting
from this rule, are stated at length in the 8th vol. of Todd's Spencer,
pp. 329, 330.
ACCESSION,
property. The ownership of a thing, whether it be real or personal,
movable or immovable, carries with it the right to all that the thing
produces, and to all that becomes united to it, either naturally or
artificially; this is called the right of accession.
2. – 1. The doctrine of property arising from accession, is grounded on the right of occupancy.
3.
– 2. The original owner of any thing which receives an accession by
natural or artificial means, as by the growth of vegetables, the
pregnancy of animals; Louis. Code, art. 491; the embroidering of cloth,
or the conversion of wood or metal into vessels or utensils, is entitled
to his right of possession to the property of it, under such its state
of improvement; 5 H. 7, 15; 12 H. 8, 10; Bro. Ab. Propertie, 23; Moor,
20; Poph. 88. But the owner must be able to prove the identity of the
original materials; for if wine, oil, or bread, be made out of another
man's grapes, olives, or wheat, they belong to the new operator, who is
bound to make satisfaction to the former proprietor for the materials
which he has so converted. 2 Bl. Com. 404; 5 Johns. Rep. 348; Betts v.
Lee, 6 Johns. Rep. 169; Curtiss v. Groat, 10 Johns. 288; Babcock v.
Gill, 9 Johns. Rep. 363; Chandler v. Edson, 5 H. 7, 15; 12 H. 8, 10;
Fits. Abr. Bar. 144; Bro. Abr. Property, 23; Doddridge Eng. Lawyer, 125,
126, 132, 134. See Adjunction; Confusion of Goods. See Generally,
Louis. Code, tit. 2, c. 2 and 3.
ACCESSION,
international law, is the absolute or conditional acceptance by one or
several states, of a treaty already concluded between one or several
states, of a traty already concluded between other sovereignties. Merl.
Rep. mot Accession.
ACCESSORY,
property. Everything which is joined to another thing, as an ornament,
or to render it more perfect, is an accessory, and belongs to the
principal thing. For example, the halter of a horse, the frame of a
picture, the keys of a house, and the like; but a bequest of a house
would not carry the furniture in it, as accessory to it. Domat, Lois
Civ. Part. 2, liv. 4, tit. 2, s. 4, n. 1. Accesiorium non ducit, sed
sequitur principale. Co. Litt. 152, a. Co. Litt. 121, b. note (6). Vide
Accession; Adjunction; Appendant; Appurtenances; Appurtenant; Incident.
ACCESSORY CONTRACT.
one made for assuring the performance of a prior contract, either by
the same parties, or by others; such as suretyship, mortgages, and
pledges.
2.
It is a general rule, that payment of the debt due, or the performance
of a thing required to be performed by the first or principal contract,
is a full discharge of such accessory obligation. Poth. Ob. part. 1, c.
1, s. 1, art. 2, n. 14. Id. n. 182, 186. See 8 Mass. 551; 15 Mass. 233;
17 Mass. 419; 4 Pick. 11; 8 Pick. 522.
3.
An accessory agreement to guaranty an original contract, which is void,
has no binding effect. 6 Humph. 261. ACCIDENT. The happening of an
event without the concurrence of the will of the person by whose agency
it was caused or the happening of an event without any human agency; the
burning of a house in consequence of a fire being made for the ordinary
purpose of cooking or warming the house, which is an accident of the
first kind; the burning of the same house by lightning would have been
an accident of the second kind. 1 Fonb. Eq. 374, 5, note.
2.
It frequently happens that a lessee covenants to repair, in which case
he is bound to do so, although the premises be burned down without his
fault. 1 Hill. Ab. c. 15, s. 76. But if a penalty be annexed to the
covenant, inevitable accident will excuse the former, though not the
latter. 1 Dyer, 33, a. Neither the landlord nor the tenant is bound to
rebuild a house burned down, unless it has been so expressly agreed.
Amb. 619; 1 T. R. 708; 4 – Paige, R. 355; 6 Mass. R. 67; 4 M'Cord, R.
431; 3 Kent, Com. 373.
3.
In New Jersey, by statute, no action lies against any person on the
ground that a fire began in a house or room occupied by him, if
accidental. But this does not affect any covenant. 1 N. J. Rev. C. 216.
No comments:
Write comments