CONIFISCATION.
The act by which the estate, goods or chattels of a person who has been
guilty of some crime, or who is a public enemy, is declared to be
forfeited for the benefit of the public treasury. Domat, Droit Public,
liv. 1, tit. 6, s. 2, n. 1. When property is forfeited as a punishment
for the commission of crime, it is usually called a forfeiture. 1 Bl.
Com. 299.
2.
It is a general rule that the property of the subjects of an enemy
found in the country may be appropriated by the government, without
notice, unless there be a treaty to the contrary. 1 Gallis. R. 563; 8
Dall. R. 199; N. Car. Cas. 79. It has been frequently provided by treaty
that foreign subjects should be permitted to remain and continue their
business, notwithstanding a rupture between the governments, so long as
they conducted themselves innocently and when there was no such treaty,
such a liberal permission has been announced in the very declaration of
war. Vattel, liv. 3, c. 4, 63. Sir Michael Poster, (Discourses on High
Treason, p. 185, 6, mentions several instances of such declarations by
the king of Great Britain; and he says that aliens were thereby enabled
to acquire personal chattels and to maintain actions for the recovery of
their personal rights, in as full a manner as alien friends. 1 Kent,
Coin. 57.
3.
In the United States, the broad principle has been assumed "that war
gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and confiscate the
property of the enemy, wherever found. The mitigations of this rigid
rule, which the policy of modern times has introduced into practice,
will more or less affect the exercise of this right, but cannot impair
the right itself." 8 Cranch, 122-3. Commercial nations have always
considerable property in the possession of their neighbors: and when war
breaks out the question, what shall be done with enemies property found
in the country, is one rather of policy than of law, and is properly
addressed to the consideration of the legislature, and not to courts of
law. The strict right of confiscation exists in congress; and without a
legislative act authorizing the confiscation of enemies' property, it
cannot be condemned. 8 Cranch, 128, 129. See Chit. Law of Nations, c. 3;
Marten's Law of Nat. lib. 8, c. 3, s. 9; Burlamaqui, Princ. of Pol.
Law, part 4, c. 7; Vattel, liv. 3, c. 4, 63.
4.
The claim of a right to confiscate debts, contracted by individuals in
time of peace, and which remain due to subjects of the enemy in time of
war, rests very much upon the same principles as that concerning the
enemy's tangible property, found in the country at the commencement of
the war. But it is the universal practice to forbear to seize and
confiscate debts and credits. 1 Kent, Com. 64, 5; vide 4 Cranch, R. 415
Charlt. 140; 2 Harr. & John. 101, 112, 471 6 Cranch, R. 286; 7 Conn.
R. 428: 2 Tayl. R. 115; 1 Day, R. 4; Kirby, R. 228, 291 C. & N. 77,
492.
No comments:
Write comments